Researchers put a group of random college students (poor college students!) through a game, which was a test:

The first stage of the game, the students are placed in groups (with some of the players being computer players, unknown to the humans). The goal of the game is to be one of three participants that end up with the most points, and they get an Amazon gift card. Each individual is given 100 points. These points can be kept or put into a group fund. If all the points in a group go into the fund, everyone gets double the points.

After that, everyone sees the other’s points. If you don’t like what someone did, you can take points away from them. But for every three points you take away from someone else, you get one point deducted from your own kitty.
After that, each participant ranks the other players from 1 (hated them) to 9 (loved them).

The researchers had one computer player which was the “stingy” player. This player gave 10 percent or less of their points. Needless to say, they were punished heavily. 70 percent of human players punished the stingy computer player at least one point and he was ranked low.

The strange thing is this: they also created an overly generous player who placed at least 90 percent or more of his points in the group fund. This player was also punished severely! Not only did more than 50 percent of the players take away points from the generous, but they also only ranked him a 3 (firm dislike)!
What does this mean? That generally, we don’t like people to be too nice, even as we don’t like them to be mean. If we are too generous, then we are likely to be dissuaded or even mildly punished by people around us.

However, Jesus warned us that if we acted in love, we would be hurt by those around us. Jesus wants us to surrender ourselves to love. But he also wants us to be realistic. If we pour ourselves out for those in need, then we will be punished, occasionally by those whom we help! That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t act selflessly, but we shouldn’t expect rewards for it.

http://arstechnica.com/science/2013/07/why-good-deeds-dont-go-unpunished/

When the song of the angels is stilled,
When the star in the sky is gone,
When the kings and princes are home,
When the shepherds are back with their flock,
The work of Christmas begins:

To find the lost,
To heal the broken,
To feed the hungry,
To release the prisoner,
To rebuild the nations,
To bring peace among brothers,
To make music in the heart.

~Howard Thurman

I am on a few philosophy forums, in which we respond to questions and posts with reasoned analysis—or at least that is the hope. One of the questions that sometimes circulate is sometimes phrased, “What is the greatest good?” or “What is the best life?” Most participants respond with a concern for their personal happiness, wanting to live a life of pleasure, or of intellectual or spiritual joy.

And why not?

It is taught to us by our parents, by television and other media that the greatest concern for us as individuals is that we be happy, that we have all of our hopes and deepest desires met. There is nothing wrong with that, in and of itself. All the great religions and philosophies have personal joy and inner peace as a goal.

However, to obtain that happiness, we often forget what we must do to obtain that happiness. I believe that unless we work to bring joy to others, we will never find joy or peace within ourselves.

A couple, after having fallen in love, decide that they will live together, and make a commitment together to be a community. Once two people begin to live together, they find that their happiness is no longer just dependent on their own concerns, but also concerns for the other. If their partner is unhappy, then they are unhappy as well. So their peace depends not so much on striving for happiness themselves, but for trying to bring peace and contentment to another.

This basic principle grows the more we are involved with others. As we have family, we need to work for peace for all. The longer we are in a community, we find that the needs of the community are tied to our own. If we live in a city of a million people, any one unhappy person we meet on the bus or the street could ruin our day. Soon we find that our happiness is not a personal commodity, as if we were an island to ourselves. Rather, contentment for ourselves is dependant at least on every other person we meet. And, to a lesser degree, to every other person in the world.

Thus, I believe that our happiness cannot be created by meeting our own needs and fulfilling our own desires. Rather, happiness is to be found in relationship, in community.

I grew up in a middle class suburban community, insulated, where I never met anyone with real needs. Our way of life and consumption was what I thought of as “normal”. My ideals all changed when I lived in a few urban areas in India and Bangladesh. There, I was followed by beggars and saw my friends living in poverty that I had never experienced. I realized that those in need were just as human and just as good and bad as I was. They were my equals, but many of them are condemned to spend their lives picking through garbage piles for whatever benefit the hundred others who had been through that same pile had left.

After Diane and I had moved to Portland, OR, we began listening to and having community with the homeless. As I listened to the stories of the homeless, and began to share their experiences myself, my own joy and sorrow became tied into their own. But what I realize is that this is true for every single person who relates to my homeless friends. Every person who gives them spare change so they would be left alone, every man who says, “get a job,” every woman who spends a few moments chatting with the homeless, every person with hope who smiles at a homeless person—that small event changed their own level of happiness. It was an experience, built with other experiences with other people, that creates their own sense of well-being or grief. Should we participate in creating other’s grief, then we ourselves live lives of grief. But if we participate in other’s sense of well-being, then we can create well-being for ourselves.

Thus, I believe that “the good life” is found, not in seeking our own happiness, but in seeking other’s well-being. Yes, we can certainly create a sense of joy in ourselves if we get drunk, or if we watch a movie. But if our contentment is based on outside forces changing our own mood, we will soon cause sorrow in others who participate in our life. Self-focus ends up draining those who love us. But if we instead focus on assisting others to obtain happiness, whether in the short term or long term— If we give hand warmers to a stranger who shivers in the cold If we give a hamburger or energy bar for a person holding a sign declaring their hunger If we spend a half hour in conversation with someone who is desperately lonely If we share a movie we really enjoy with someone who has no pleasures in their life If we invite to a family holiday meal one who has no family to share it with— Then the happiness we share will be ours as well.

There is no personal happiness. There is only happiness we share with others, especially with those who have little joy in their lives.

God has sent an army of invisible people throughout the world. They are in every nation, but most importantly among the most powerful people with the greatest amount of resources. These are innocent people, they have done no wrong, harmed no one. They are also desperately poor. Some may ask for help, others will not. But those of us with full pockets know of their need. The only question the universe asks of us is if we will help.

On the day of our passing, God will measure our mercy and compassion. And he doesn’t have any secret MRI that determines this. He will simply ask those whom He sent around us, “Did this one help you? Did she have compassion on you? Was he there for you in your desperation?”

God is establishing a kingdom. And his kingdom will be filled with people who learned enough of God’s love that they will see the person in need, just like God does. That the first question they ask themselves is, “Does this person need food, water, help”, not “Do they deserve it” just like God meets the needs of those who do not deserve it.

If you are a lover of God, then the real question is: Do you see like God sees? Do you see the needy with compassion or with disgust or avoidance?

Peacemaking is anger at injustice
And choosing to heal instead of punish

Peacemaking is the war against hatred,
Judgment and apathy, harming none.

Peacemaking is entering into another’s life
By listening to their story

Peacemaking is welcoming the outcast
And creating a safe place for them

Peacemaking comes from inner peace
Inner peace comes from silence

Peacemaking is making a plan for the needy
In order to help them thrive

Peacemaking is choosing the one-down
In order to support others

Peacemaking is confronting the wrongdoer
And forgiving them

Peacemaking is living for oneself
By living for others

Peacemaking is rejecting rejection,
Judging judging and turning away from apathy.

Peacemaking is standing with the outcast
By yourself

Peacemaking is creating a community
Of the hated and the lovers

Peacemaking is healing one’s own soul
By restoring others

Peacemaking is Jesus on the cross
Bringing God into this world through surrendering oneself